Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL has a general score of 80.7, which is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's 78.5 global score. Although it's the best in this comparison, we must highlight that it is also an a lot older, a bit heavier and just a bit thicker phone. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a quite worse amount of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a little bigger display.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. Google Pixel 3 XL has a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has improved battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity instead of 3430mAh. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion captures much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also has a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels, a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a much larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.