Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, getting a global score of 81.9 against 78.5. The Google Pixel 4 construction is just a little bit lighter than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it's just a little bit thicker and was released many years before. The Google Pixel 4 features a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has just a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a just a bit inferior pixels quantity in each inch of display, it also counts with a bit bigger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a much bigger memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has more internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a superior battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a very superior camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low-light images, it also counts with a camera with way more megapixels, a much better video resolution and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.