Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a has a score of 82.9, which is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's 78.5 global score. Google Pixel 4a's construction is lighter than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, but it is just a little bit thicker and was released many years before. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Google Pixel 4a has the older 11 version and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12 version.
Google Pixel 4a counts with a much greater processing power than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a little bit better display than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion and Google Pixel 4a feature similar storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos, both of them have the same internal storage. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a lot better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low light photography, it also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a way better image and video quality, a back facing camera with a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.