Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 12 | Android 5.0 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 405 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.65 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.24 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion is slightly better than the HTC One M9, getting a 78.5 score against 77.7. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion body is a lot newer and a lot thinner than HTC One M9's, although it's also a little heavier. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has 12 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version, providing some extra features.
The HTC One M9 features a much better performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has lesser RAM memory, and they both have 8 processing cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64 bits CPU and an additional GPU. HTC One M9 has a bit better screen than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has a much smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px, it also counts with a bit higher pixel number in each screen inch.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a way better camera than HTC One M9, because it has a larger camera aperture to take better low-light captures and video, a way larger sensor, a much more megapixels back facing camera and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a really longer battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.