Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion is slightly better than HTC U Ultra, with a 78.5 score against 77. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion design is noticeably newer, a little thinner and a little lighter than the HTC U Ultra. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a little bit better display than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a bit lower amount of pixels per display inch and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a little bit larger display.
The HTC U Ultra features a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has 4 GB less RAM and a lower number of cores (but faster). The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a very superior camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also has a way better video resolution, a much bigger back camera sensor and a camera with a way better resolution.
HTC U Ultra counts with a way bigger memory to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a very superior battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.