Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 12 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2022-09-08 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, having an 82.5 score against 78.5. These devices include Android operating system, but the LG V30S ThinQ has a newer 8.0 Oreo version and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12, giving a couple nice extra features and some performance improvements. LG V30S ThinQ's body is just a little lighter and a little thinner than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, even though it was released many years before.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a little sharper display than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a just a little less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit larger screen. The LG V30S ThinQ features a way better performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion shoots a lot better photographs and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for taking photos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video quality, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a much better 50 MP resolution back facing camera.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with greater battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 33% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.