Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, having an 81.3 score against 78.5. The LG V35 ThinQ body is just a bit thinner and a little bit lighter than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, despite of the fact that it was released 4 years before. LG V35 ThinQ has a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a bit more vivid screen than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch of display and a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a quite larger screen. LG V35 ThinQ features a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion shoots much clearer videos and photos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for taking pictures or videos in low-light environments, it also counts with a back facing camera with a way better resolution, a way larger camera sensor and a much better 7680x4320 video definition.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with better battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.