Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, getting a overall score of 81.2 against 78.5. The LG V40 ThinQ body has the same thickness than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, but it is a bit heavier. These phones have Android OS, but LG V40 ThinQ has the older 10 version while Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12 version.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a bit sharper screen than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of screen and a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a little bigger display.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a way better camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing images and videos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a much better 50 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, a lot bigger sensor which offers a way higher photo and video quality and a way better 7680x4320 video definition.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has superior battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.