Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Microsoft |
| Android 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2021-09-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Glacier and Obsidian |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, having an 85.3 score against 78.5. Although the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is older and notably heavier than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, it's design is still extremely thinner. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has the previous 11 version while Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion. Both have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cores. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features just a bit better screen than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has a lot lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a way smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel amount per inch in the display and a brighter screen.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2's storage capacity for apps and games is very similar to the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion one, both have exactly the same internal memory capacity. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a bit longer battery duration than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has 4449mAh of battery capacity instead of 4400mAh.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion shoots much better photos and videos than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a way more mega-pixels camera and a much better 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.