Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 12 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-09-08 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion is slightly better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, with a overall score of 78.5 against 75.8. Both devices in this review have Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has an older 12 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion design is notably newer, thinner and much lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3S.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a slightly better looking display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a just a little better number of pixels per inch of screen. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a much better performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger amount of RAM. The nubia Red Magic 3S features just a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has a 14% more battery size.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion captures clearer pictures and videos than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for taking photos and videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video definition, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also counts with a way bigger camera sensor, a camera in the back with a better 50 megapixels resolution and better 30 fps video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.