Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.65 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A30 is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, getting a 79.6 score against 78.5. Samsung Galaxy A30's design has the same thickness than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, but it's just a little bit lighter. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy A30, because it has a slightly better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a quite greater display density and a quite larger screen.
Galaxy A30 counts with a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A30 has a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A30, because it has a 10 percent more battery size. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion captures way better pictures and videos than Galaxy A30, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher 50 MP resolution, a way higher video definition and a way larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.