Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.65 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A31 is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, with an 81.3 score against 78.5. Despite being the best phone we compare here, the Samsung Galaxy A31 is an extremely older, somewhat thicker and a little bit heavier phone than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A31 has an older 10 version and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12 version.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy A31, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch of screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also counts with a little bit bigger screen. Galaxy A31 has an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A31 features a greater memory to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A31 has just a little bit longer battery performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion takes much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A31, because it has a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photographs, a larger aperture, a much higher video definition and a more mega pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.