Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2021-02-25 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | -- |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.65 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, with a score of 82 against 78.5. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has the previous 11 version and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12 version. Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only's construction is incredibly lighter than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, but it's a bit thicker and was released just a bit more than a year before.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a little bit worse number of pixels per inch of screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also counts with a bit bigger screen and more brightness.
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only features a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a bit superior battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has a 14 percent more battery capacity. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a way less megapixels resolution back-facing camera, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also counts with a way higher video definition and a lot larger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.