Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 14 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.65 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, having a global score of 79.4 against 78.5. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G is a newer cellphone than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, but it is somewhat heavier and a bit thicker. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a newer 14 version while Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a little faster processor than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a bit better screen than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with much more brightness, a just a bit more pixels per screen inch and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Galaxy A35 5G's memory for games and applications is very similar to the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion one, both of them have the same 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy A35 5G has a little better battery performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4400mAh. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion shoots much better photos and videos than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture and the same resolution camera in the back, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also has a lot better 7680x4320 video quality and a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.