Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-09-08 | 2019-04-10 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 4.94 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 437 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Exynos 7904 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.65 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A40 is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, with a 79.6 score against 78.5. The Samsung Galaxy A40 is a noticeably older and just a little thicker phone than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, but Samsung managed to make it somewhat lighter anyway. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A40 has an older 11 version while Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A40, because although it has a just a little less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a little bit bigger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Galaxy A40 has an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A40, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for capturing images or videos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a lot higher image and video quality, a lot better video definition and a way more mega pixels camera in the back.
The Galaxy A40 features a greater storage to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A40, because it has a 4400mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.