Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.65 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a score of 78.5, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A5 (2017)'s 75.8 global score. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's construction is noticeably newer and just a bit thinner than Galaxy A5 (2017)'s, although it's a little bit heavier. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has a just a little lower display pixels density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a larger display.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) features a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion captures much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a much higher video quality, a camera with a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.