Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has a general score of 83.8, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's 78.5 overall score. The Galaxy A50 design has the same thickness than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, but it is a bit lighter. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy A50, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, a quite bigger display and a quite greater count of pixels per display inch.
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a much better performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a greater camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light images and videos, it also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a way more MP back-facing camera and a much better video quality.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features just a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 10% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.