Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-09-08 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s is better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, getting an 86.6 score against 78.5. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A50s has older 10 version while Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12 version. The Samsung Galaxy A50s is a just a little bit lighter cellphone than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, but both of them are 0.3inches thick.
The Galaxy A50s has a much greater processing power than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a little bit bigger display, a little higher pixel density and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A50s, because it has a higher resolution back camera, a much higher video quality, a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking much higher quality photos and a larger camera aperture. The Galaxy A50s counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy A50s also has a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with just a bit better battery life than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 10 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.