Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 has a global score of 85.5, which is a bit better than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's 78.5 score. These devices come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A51 has the previous 11 version and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12. Although it's the best phone in our current comparison, Samsung Galaxy A51's design is extremely older, just a little heavier and a bit thicker than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A51. Both of them have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, the same display pixel density and a same size screen. The Galaxy A51 features a much better performing CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Galaxy A51 features a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A51 also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy A51, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion takes a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A51, because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a larger aperture to capture better low light photos, a better resolution back facing camera and a way larger back camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.