Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a global score of 90.8, which is better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's general score of 78.5. Both phones in this comparison have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has older 11 version and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12 version. Although it's the best phone in this review, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G design is notably older, somewhat heavier and thicker than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion.
Galaxy A51 5G features a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G. Both have a screen with the same size, the same count of pixels in each inch in the screen and exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Galaxy A51 5G has much more storage to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Galaxy A51 5G also has an external memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy A51 5G counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4400mAh.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a way larger back camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and photos, a larger aperture to capture better captures in low-light environments, a much higher 7680x4320 video quality and a higher 50 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.