Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, with a global score of 90.7 against 78.5. Galaxy A52 is an older, just a little thicker and heavier device than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A52. Both have a same size display, a greater pixels amount per screen inch and the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion captures just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A52, because although it has a camera with a lot lower 50 MP resolution, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also counts with a larger camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Galaxy A52 features a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A52 also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52 has a bit longer battery performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.