Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G has a general score of 91.3, which is much better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's global score of 78.5. Both phones in our current comparison come with the same Android 12 operating system. Although Galaxy A52 5G is better than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, we must highlight that it is also older, heavier and a bit thicker.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A52 5G. Both have the same screen pixels density, a display with the same size and the same 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has much more memory for applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a lot less mega pixels resolution back facing camera, and they both have the same aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting higher quality pictures and videos and a lot better video definition.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a bit superior battery duration than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.