Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s is better than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, having a overall score of 91.1 against 78.5. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A52s has the previous 11 version while Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12. Even being the best cellphone we compare here, Galaxy A52s is an older, heavier and a little bit thicker cellphone than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A52s. Both have a better pixel amount per inch in the screen, a display of the same size and the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution. Galaxy A52s has a much faster processor than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has a way lower resolution back-facing camera, and they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also counts with a bigger sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality and a lot better video definition.
Galaxy A52s has a much greater storage for apps and games than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A52s also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A52s has just a little better battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has a 2 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.