Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-09-08 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A70, getting a global score of 78.5 against 76.9. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has the newer 12 version while Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion design is notably newer, just a little bit lighter and just a little thinner than Samsung Galaxy A70.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a sharper screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the display. Samsung Galaxy A70 features a much better storage for applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion shoots way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for taking pictures and video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a way better video quality and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
Galaxy A70 has a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has a 2% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.