Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 is better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, with an 87.5 score against 78.5. Galaxy A71 is a just a little heavier device than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, but they have the same thickness. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Galaxy A71 has the older 11 version while Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A71, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also counts with a just a bit better pixels amount in each inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy A71 has an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A71, because although it has a back facing camera with a much lower 50 mega-pixels resolution, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also counts with a bigger sensor taking better quality videos and photographs and a much better video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 counts with a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A71 counts with a little better battery performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.