Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.65 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A9 (2018) has an overall score of 85.2, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's global score of 78.5. The Galaxy A9 (2018) body is extremely older, just a little bit heavier and just a little thicker than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a quite larger display, a just a bit greater quantity of pixels in each inch of display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) features a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. Galaxy A9 (2018) has a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a bit longer battery life than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video quality, a way larger sensor which provides a way higher image and video quality and a much better 50 mega-pixels resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.