Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-09-08 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is much better than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, having a 97.6 score against 78.5. Despite of the fact the Galaxy Fold is older and a lot heavier than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, it's body is still a little bit thinner. Both of these devices have Android OS, but Galaxy Fold has a newer 9.0 Pie version while Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has more RAM. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a better display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little greater number of pixels per display inch.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion shoots a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot higher video definition, a way bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much better resolution back facing camera. The Galaxy Fold features a way bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has 384 GB more internal storage.
Galaxy Fold and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion both have very similar batteries, although the Galaxy Fold has a 0 percent lower battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.