Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2022-09-08 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.65 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M20 is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, having a score of 78.9 against 78.5. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy M20 has the previous 10 version while Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12. Despite being the best phone we compare here, we must tell that it's also older, just a little bit heavier and thicker.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a little bit worse quantity of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a quite larger display. The Samsung Galaxy M20 has a much more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a very superior camera than Galaxy M20, because it has a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution, a lot higher video definition, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot better quality pictures and a bigger aperture to take better captures and video in poorly lited environments.
Galaxy M20 features a greater storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Galaxy M20 counts with a bit better battery performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has a 14 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.