Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2022-09-08 | 2019-03-07 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.65 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M30 has an overall score of 82.4, which is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's 78.5 global score. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy M30 has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12, giving a couple additional features and performance improvements. Galaxy M30's construction is noticeably older, a bit heavier and a little bit thicker than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion.
The Galaxy M30 features a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy M30, because it has a just a little greater screen pixel density, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little larger screen.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy M30, because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video definition, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photos and videos in poorly lited environments, a much higher 50 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality pictures and videos.
Galaxy M30 features a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy M30 also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy M30 features just a little better battery life than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.