Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.65 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M51 has an overall score of 87.7, which is much better than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's overall score of 78.5. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Galaxy M51 has the previous 10 version and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12. Galaxy M51's construction is older, extremely heavier and somewhat thicker than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 features a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a brighter screen than Galaxy M51, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a little more pixels per inch in the display.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion captures a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy M51, because although it has a back-facing camera with much less mega-pixels resolution, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also counts with a larger sensor shooting higher quality videos and pictures and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Galaxy M51 counts with a way bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy M51 also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy M51 features a superior battery life than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.