Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, getting a score of 90.8 against 78.5. Despite being the best phone in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is an a lot older, somewhat heavier and just a little thicker phone than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also counts with a just a little better pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion. Both of them have a 8 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processor. The Galaxy Note 20's memory capacity for applications and games is very similar to the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion one, they have the same 128 GB internal storage.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion shoots much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same video resolution and a same size camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also has faster video frame rate, a larger sensor capturing higher quality videos and photographs and a way better 50 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.