Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, having a 98.9 score against 78.5. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a older, somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker cellphone than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the newer 13 version and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12 version, so it gives you a couple additional features.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a bit worse count of pixels per inch in the display, a bit smaller screen and a lot worse 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much better performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 4 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit superior battery life than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has a 2% larger battery size.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures slightly better videos and photos than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same aperture and the same 7680x4320 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also counts with a bigger sensor and a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.