Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 5.1 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 5 is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, having a global score of 79.3 against 78.5. Galaxy Note 5's body has the same thickness than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, but it's just a bit heavier. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 5 has 5.1 version while Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12.
Galaxy Note 5 counts with a slightly better display than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 and more pixels per inch of display. Galaxy Note 5 features an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory and a lower number of cores (although they are faster).
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because it has more internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a way better battery performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion captures way better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a way better 7680x4320 video resolution, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality, a back facing camera with a much higher 50 mega-pixels resolution and a bigger camera aperture to capture better captures and videos in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.