Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.65 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a score of 80.4, which is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's score of 78.5. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition's body is a bit lighter than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it's just a bit thicker and was released 5 years before. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has just a bit better display than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little lower display density, it also counts with a bit bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs in low light situations, it also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video definition, a way bigger back camera sensor and a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has slightly more storage for applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits up to 256 GB. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a much longer battery performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 38% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.