Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy Note3, with a overall score of 78.5 against 77.7. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion construction has the same weight than the Samsung Galaxy Note3, but it's just a little bit thinner. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has the previous 12 version while Samsung Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2 version.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a more vivid screen than Galaxy Note3, because it has a quite higher quantity of pixels in each screen inch, a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit larger screen. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with just a bit more memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Note3 features a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has an inferior number of cores and lesser RAM memory. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note3, because it has a much higher video quality, a way more mega pixels back facing camera, a larger diafragm aperture for better low light photography and a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note3, because it has a 38 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.