Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-09-08 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 has a score of 88.3, which is better than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's 78.5 general score. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Galaxy S10 has older 11 version and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12 version. Galaxy S10's design is a little lighter than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it is just a little thicker and was released many years before.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion both have quite similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy S10 has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3040 resolution and a greater amount of pixels per inch of screen. Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion. Both of them have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light images and video, it also counts with a way better video quality, a way higher 50 MP resolution back-facing camera and a lot larger sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Galaxy S10 counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S10 also has an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has a 4400mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.