Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite is much better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, having a global score of 89.7 against 78.5. Even being the best cellphone in this comparison review, it must be noted that it is also a much older, just a little bit heavier and a little bit thicker cellphone. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion. They have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM memory.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also counts with a just a little greater display pixel density.
Galaxy S10 Lite features a much better storage to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality, a bigger aperture to capture better captures in poorly lited environments, a back facing camera with a better 50 MP resolution and a lot bigger camera sensor.
Galaxy S10 Lite has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.