Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10e has an overall score of 86.3, which is better than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's 78.5 overall score. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S10e is older and just a little bit thicker than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, it's body is still somewhat lighter. Galaxy S10e has a much better performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a just a bit worse pixels quantity in each inch of display, it also counts with a bit larger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels and a much higher video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with much more storage to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 4400mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.