Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a score of 94.8, which is much better than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's 78.5 general score. Both phones in this review include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S20 has newer 13 version and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12 version, so it gives a couple additional features. The Samsung Galaxy S20 is a much older and a little bit thicker phone than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, but Samsung made it just a little bit lighter anyway.
Galaxy S20 counts with a much better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 also has more RAM. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion and the Samsung Galaxy S20 both count with similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy S20 has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel amount per display inch and a better 1440 x 3200 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has much more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a much better camera than Galaxy S20, and although they both have the same video resolution and a F1.8 aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also has better 30 frames per second video frame rate, a larger camera sensor providing a better image quality and a lot better resolution back facing camera.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features just a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.