Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE is much better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, having a 90.8 score against 78.5. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 FE has an older 11 version while Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12 version. Even being the best in this review, the Galaxy S20 FE construction is older, a bit thicker and somewhat heavier than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a much better performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE. Both have a screen with the same size, a greater pixel amount per inch in the screen and the same exact 1080 x 2400px resolution.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion takes better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also has a way better video definition, a much more MP camera and a bigger back camera sensor providing a better image quality. Galaxy S20 FE features a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S20 FE features a little better battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.