Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 98, which is much better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's global score of 78.5. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a more recent 13 version while Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12 version, so it counts with a couple nice extra features and improved performance. Even being the best we are comparing, Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a much older, thicker and incredibly heavier phone than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a little bit better display than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a little bit lower display pixels density, a little bit smaller screen and a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with much more memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has lower video frame rates and a much tinier camera sensor, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same 7680x4320 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a way higher 108 mega pixels resolution camera.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit superior battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has a 14 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.