Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a global score of 95.4, which is much better than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's 78.5 score. Both of these devices use Android OS, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has newer 13 version while Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12 version, providing some extra features and performance improvements. Despite being the best in our current comparison, the Galaxy S22 Ultra construction is thicker and a lot heavier than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a better looking display than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has way more brightness, a little larger screen, a little bit higher pixel count per display inch and a better 1440 x 3088 resolution. Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much faster processor than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion. They have 8 GB of RAM and 8 processing cores.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra's storage to store more apps and games is just as good as the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion one, both of them have equal internal memory. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a little better battery life than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has a 14 percent bigger battery size. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a slightly better camera than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have a same size aperture and the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also counts with a much more mega-pixels back facing camera and a larger sensor providing a higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.