Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.9 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.65 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 10.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.24 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, with a 78.5 score against 77.8. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion is a a lot newer and somewhat thinner cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, although it is just a little bit heavier. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has the previous 12 version and Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a very superior CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster) and less RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics processing unit. The Galaxy S5 Sport has a bit sharper screen than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has a much smaller screen and a bit lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little bit higher pixel quantity per screen inch.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a greater camera than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light photos and videos, a much better video resolution, a much bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back-facing camera with a much better resolution.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a way better battery life than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.