Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 5.0 |
| 2022-09-08 | -- |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | -- |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.9 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.65 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S6 Active has an overall score of 80.9, which is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's global score of 78.5. These phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy S6 Active has older 5.0 version and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12 version. Galaxy S6 Active's construction is thicker but a lot lighter than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion.
The Galaxy S6 Active counts with a brighter screen than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a lot bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy S6 Active features a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has 5 GB lesser RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with an extra graphics co-processor and a 64-bits processor. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion shoots way better videos and photos than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a bigger camera aperture, a much larger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality, a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution and a back camera with much more MP.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with superior battery life than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 4400mAh battery size instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.