Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, with a 78.5 score against 75.8. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's body is extremely newer, a bit lighter and incredibly thinner than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. The Galaxy S7 Active features a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has a lower number of cores and 4 GB less RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has much less brightness and a really smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and more pixels per inch in the display. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low light photos and video, it also counts with a much better 50 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a way higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a better storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 10% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.