Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S8 has a general score of 81.7, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's 78.5 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy S8 construction is a bit lighter than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it's a little bit thicker and was released many years before. Galaxy S8 features a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy S8 has a display that is very similar to Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's display, because although the Galaxy S8 has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2960 resolution. Galaxy S8 has a bit more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 256 GB.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a superior battery life than Galaxy S8, because it has a 47% greater battery capacity. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S8, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking photos or videos in low light situations, it also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor, a way better resolution back facing camera and a way better 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.