Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S8 Active is a bit better than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, having an 81.9 score against 78.5. Galaxy S8 Active is a better cellphone than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, it must be noted that it is also a noticeably older, a lot thicker and heavier cellphone. The Galaxy S8 Active counts with a much better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy S8 Active features a screen that's just as good as the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion one, because although the Galaxy S8 Active has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2960 and a higher number of pixels per inch of screen. The Galaxy S8 Active has a bit more storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion captures a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light images and video, it also counts with a lot higher 50 mega pixels resolution camera, a way better video definition and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a much better image and video quality.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.