Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | -- |
| 405 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.65 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, with a global score of 80.1 against 78.5. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is an a lot older, much thicker and heavier device than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has newer 8.0 Oreo version and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12, giving you a lot of extra features and a performance increase.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro both count with really similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel quantity per screen inch and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a better memory to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a bit longer battery duration than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for taking photos and videos in low-light environments, it also counts with a much larger sensor which provides a much better photo and video quality, a much better resolution back facing camera and a much higher video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.