Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a global score of 81, which is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's 78.5 global score. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Galaxy XCover Pro has 11 version while Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12 version. The Galaxy XCover Pro body is much older, way thicker and noticeably heavier than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a little bit bigger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Galaxy XCover Pro features a better memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a much faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 9 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for shooting photographs in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition, a much larger camera sensor shooting way better quality photos and a way better resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.