Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has a global score of 88.5, which is better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's 78.5 global score. The Galaxy Z Flip body is just a little bit thinner than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, but it is a little bit heavier and was released 3 years before. Both of these devices come with the same Android 12 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't see any difference regarding that.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a bit worse quantity of pixels per display inch, a quite smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much greater storage to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion. Both have the same number of cores and 8 GB of RAM memory. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4400mAh battery size. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion captures way better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also has a much more mega pixels back-facing camera, a lot higher video resolution and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.